<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reflections on 2007 &#8211; En Route to 2017</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vaughanmerlyn.com/2007/12/27/reflections-on-2007-en-route-to-2017/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vaughanmerlyn.com/2007/12/27/reflections-on-2007-en-route-to-2017/</link>
	<description>Vaughan Merlyn on the Changing Role of the IT Organization</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 12:38:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: itorganization2017</title>
		<link>http://vaughanmerlyn.com/2007/12/27/reflections-on-2007-en-route-to-2017/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[itorganization2017]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 16:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itorganization2017.wordpress.com/2007/12/27/reflections-on-2007-en-route-to-2017/#comment-75</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You raise an interesting and compelling point - the linkage of IT and Marketing.   I could make similar points about the linkage of IT and HR (leveraging talent through the emerging Web 2.0 technologies); linkage of IT and supply chain (increasing supply chain velocity and efficiency); and so on.  IT is permeating all facets of the business, requiring new forms of collaboration and partnership between the IT organization and the business it serves - I&#039;ve referred to this in prior posts as &quot;business-IT convergence.&quot;  Unfortunately, achieving this is easier said than done!  Perhaps we&#039;ll see more real success stories in 2008...
Thanks again, Janet, for your comments and insight!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You raise an interesting and compelling point &#8211; the linkage of IT and Marketing.   I could make similar points about the linkage of IT and HR (leveraging talent through the emerging Web 2.0 technologies); linkage of IT and supply chain (increasing supply chain velocity and efficiency); and so on.  IT is permeating all facets of the business, requiring new forms of collaboration and partnership between the IT organization and the business it serves &#8211; I&#8217;ve referred to this in prior posts as &#8220;business-IT convergence.&#8221;  Unfortunately, achieving this is easier said than done!  Perhaps we&#8217;ll see more real success stories in 2008&#8230;<br />
Thanks again, Janet, for your comments and insight!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janet Johnson</title>
		<link>http://vaughanmerlyn.com/2007/12/27/reflections-on-2007-en-route-to-2017/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Janet Johnson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 15:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itorganization2017.wordpress.com/2007/12/27/reflections-on-2007-en-route-to-2017/#comment-74</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the clarifications on all points.  As a customer of IT (VP Marketing) I appreciate the focus in the near term on business analytics as well as the notion of more differentiating and satisfactory customer experiences.  I believe IT and marketing are linked more now than they&#039;ve ever been before, and we have so much to gain from each others&#039; efforts.

Subscribed!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the clarifications on all points.  As a customer of IT (VP Marketing) I appreciate the focus in the near term on business analytics as well as the notion of more differentiating and satisfactory customer experiences.  I believe IT and marketing are linked more now than they&#8217;ve ever been before, and we have so much to gain from each others&#8217; efforts.</p>
<p>Subscribed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reflections on 2007 - En Route to 2017 (Part 2) &#171; IT Organization Circa 2017</title>
		<link>http://vaughanmerlyn.com/2007/12/27/reflections-on-2007-en-route-to-2017/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reflections on 2007 - En Route to 2017 (Part 2) &#171; IT Organization Circa 2017]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 13:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itorganization2017.wordpress.com/2007/12/27/reflections-on-2007-en-route-to-2017/#comment-73</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Posts Did You Accidently Outsource Your Enterprise Architecture?CIO vs. CTO - What&#039;s The Difference?Reflections on 2007 - En Route to 2017IT Maturity and the Role of Relationship ManagementBusiness-IT Maturity: Theory Of The Case - Part [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Posts Did You Accidently Outsource Your Enterprise Architecture?CIO vs. CTO &#8211; What&#8217;s The Difference?Reflections on 2007 &#8211; En Route to 2017IT Maturity and the Role of Relationship ManagementBusiness-IT Maturity: Theory Of The Case &#8211; Part [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: itorganization2017</title>
		<link>http://vaughanmerlyn.com/2007/12/27/reflections-on-2007-en-route-to-2017/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[itorganization2017]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 21:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itorganization2017.wordpress.com/2007/12/27/reflections-on-2007-en-route-to-2017/#comment-72</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excellent question, Janet!  First, yes, I do think that my 2nd and 3rd &quot;predictions&#039; are linked (actually, I think these are really observations, rather than predictions, based upon what I see in my client and research bases).

While I agree wtih your question about it perhaps being &quot;too early to prove business value&quot;, a couple of points:  First, the way most organizations track and measure the business value, there is very little that is actually &quot;proven&quot; in terms of business value, but we continue spending billions, presumably based upon some sense that the spending is cost-justified.  Second, there is value in many of the experiments organizations are conducting around Web 2.0 technologies - even if those experiments simply highlight the organizational change management implications of deploying these tools.

To your initial question, among the higher value activities I foresee IT organizations focusing on are business analytics, business simulation and modeling, moving to more agile business process architectures, and increased focus on shaping a more differentiating and satisfactory customer experiences.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent question, Janet!  First, yes, I do think that my 2nd and 3rd &#8220;predictions&#8217; are linked (actually, I think these are really observations, rather than predictions, based upon what I see in my client and research bases).</p>
<p>While I agree wtih your question about it perhaps being &#8220;too early to prove business value&#8221;, a couple of points:  First, the way most organizations track and measure the business value, there is very little that is actually &#8220;proven&#8221; in terms of business value, but we continue spending billions, presumably based upon some sense that the spending is cost-justified.  Second, there is value in many of the experiments organizations are conducting around Web 2.0 technologies &#8211; even if those experiments simply highlight the organizational change management implications of deploying these tools.</p>
<p>To your initial question, among the higher value activities I foresee IT organizations focusing on are business analytics, business simulation and modeling, moving to more agile business process architectures, and increased focus on shaping a more differentiating and satisfactory customer experiences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janet Johnson</title>
		<link>http://vaughanmerlyn.com/2007/12/27/reflections-on-2007-en-route-to-2017/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Janet Johnson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 18:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itorganization2017.wordpress.com/2007/12/27/reflections-on-2007-en-route-to-2017/#comment-71</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What kinds of &quot;higher business value&quot; activities do you predict IT orgs to focus on?  Do you believe the coupling of your second- and third- predictions will be inherent?  e.g. will IT get out of PC support activities  and into testing collaborative tools like enterprise RSS systems and other productivity tools for knowlege workers; or do you think it&#039;s too early to prove a business value for them?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What kinds of &#8220;higher business value&#8221; activities do you predict IT orgs to focus on?  Do you believe the coupling of your second- and third- predictions will be inherent?  e.g. will IT get out of PC support activities  and into testing collaborative tools like enterprise RSS systems and other productivity tools for knowlege workers; or do you think it&#8217;s too early to prove a business value for them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

