<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Goodby, Shadow IT &#8211; Hello, Shadow IT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vaughanmerlyn.com/2008/03/07/goodby-shadow-it-hello-shadow-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vaughanmerlyn.com/2008/03/07/goodby-shadow-it-hello-shadow-it/</link>
	<description>Vaughan Merlyn on the Changing Role of the IT Organization</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 12:38:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: From Business-IT Alignment to Business-IT Convergence &#171; IT Organization Circa 2017</title>
		<link>http://vaughanmerlyn.com/2008/03/07/goodby-shadow-it-hello-shadow-it/#comment-1595</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[From Business-IT Alignment to Business-IT Convergence &#171; IT Organization Circa 2017]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 09:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itorganization2017.wordpress.com/?p=200#comment-1595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] to Business-IT Convergence as an aspect of increasing business and IT maturity.  I&#8217;ve noted (Goodbye, Shadow IT &#8211; Hello, Shadow IT) that &#8216;Shadow IT&#8217;, often viewed as a problem to be solved might be more appropriately [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to Business-IT Convergence as an aspect of increasing business and IT maturity.  I&#8217;ve noted (Goodbye, Shadow IT &#8211; Hello, Shadow IT) that &#8216;Shadow IT&#8217;, often viewed as a problem to be solved might be more appropriately [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: To Centralize or Decentralize IT - That Was The Question&#8230; &#171; IT Organization Circa 2017</title>
		<link>http://vaughanmerlyn.com/2008/03/07/goodby-shadow-it-hello-shadow-it/#comment-499</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[To Centralize or Decentralize IT - That Was The Question&#8230; &#171; IT Organization Circa 2017]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 13:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itorganization2017.wordpress.com/?p=200#comment-499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] to anything other than themselves.  (such departments are often referred to as &#8220;Shadow IT.&#8221;)  Sometimes these departments were interested in systems that were standalone and had [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to anything other than themselves.  (such departments are often referred to as &#8220;Shadow IT.&#8221;)  Sometimes these departments were interested in systems that were standalone and had [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Scrupski</title>
		<link>http://vaughanmerlyn.com/2008/03/07/goodby-shadow-it-hello-shadow-it/#comment-192</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Susan Scrupski]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 14:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itorganization2017.wordpress.com/?p=200#comment-192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Vaughan.  Shhhh!  Don&#039;t write about this!  :-)  There is still enough market confusion and early adoption going on in the Enterprise 2.0 space that we need not start discussing, well, reality.

I blogged about this nearly one year to the day: http://susanitsa.wordpress.com/2007/02/28/mokita-the-truth-that-everyone-knows-but-no-one-talks-about/ 
The comments are worth reading too.  The truth is, much of Enterprise 2.0 is taking place &quot;under the radar&quot; of IT for many of the reasons you mentioned.  Where it&#039;s headed is unclear at this point.  Many enterprise 2.0 tools specifically promote the end-user ease of adoption (sans IT, btw).   See this overview page at Central Desktop: http://www.centraldesktop.com/tour_overview.  I am participating in one of our fabulous Research projects on &quot;Redefining End-user Computing.&quot;  It is one of our most popular research projects with many F500 companies participating. Alas, the dialog is beginning!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Vaughan.  Shhhh!  Don&#8217;t write about this!  <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />   There is still enough market confusion and early adoption going on in the Enterprise 2.0 space that we need not start discussing, well, reality.</p>
<p>I blogged about this nearly one year to the day: <a href="http://susanitsa.wordpress.com/2007/02/28/mokita-the-truth-that-everyone-knows-but-no-one-talks-about/" rel="nofollow">http://susanitsa.wordpress.com/2007/02/28/mokita-the-truth-that-everyone-knows-but-no-one-talks-about/</a><br />
The comments are worth reading too.  The truth is, much of Enterprise 2.0 is taking place &#8220;under the radar&#8221; of IT for many of the reasons you mentioned.  Where it&#8217;s headed is unclear at this point.  Many enterprise 2.0 tools specifically promote the end-user ease of adoption (sans IT, btw).   See this overview page at Central Desktop: <a href="http://www.centraldesktop.com/tour_overview" rel="nofollow">http://www.centraldesktop.com/tour_overview</a>.  I am participating in one of our fabulous Research projects on &#8220;Redefining End-user Computing.&#8221;  It is one of our most popular research projects with many F500 companies participating. Alas, the dialog is beginning!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

