With apologies to Ed Yourdon for my plagiarism of his original the book title, published back in 1993, “The Decline and Fall of the American Programmer“. (Though I don’t recall if Ed gave apologies to Gibbon for first using this line!)
For a blog entitled “IT Organization 2017″ and for a management consultant who has had a very satisfying professional career consulting to IT organizations, the title of this post may seem both extreme and inappropriate. However, I use the title not just as a controversial ‘hook’ to attract readership, but as a sincere expression of what I think is happening today – and will continue to do so. The traditional role of the IT organization is on the decline and will never return to the importance and business value impact it had over the last 50 years. The good news is, there is a crucial new role emerging – and for IT leaders that can envision and lead the new possibilities, I believe there’s a bright new future – perhaps brighter than the traditional IT leadership role.
So, Who Screwed Up the IT Organization?
I’m not sure this is anyone’s ‘fault’ per se, or could have been avoided. Rather it is a natural by product of technological evolution. Back in the late 1800′s, many corporations employed Chief Electrical Officers. Nick Carr gets into this nicely in his aptly named book, “The Big Switch.”
A hundred years ago, companies stopped generating their own power with steam engines and dynamos and plugged into the newly built electric grid. The cheap power pumped out by electric utilities didn’t just change how businesses operate. It set off a chain reaction of economic and social transformations that brought the modern world into existence. Today, a similar revolution is under way. Hooked up to the Internet’s global computing grid, massive information-processing plants have begun pumping data and software code into our homes and businesses. This time, it’s computing that’s turning into a utility.”
The shift from electricity as a highly specialized resource to commodity took about a decade as standards such as voltage, alternating current, plug and socket configurations, and so on were settled. Once the standards existed, businesses could simply plug into a grid – electricity became a commodity, and the Chief Electrical Officers become extinct as the Dodo.
An Historical Perspective
The first commercial mainframe computers, the LEO were created in 1951 by J. Lyons and Company, a British catering and food manufacturing firm. The idea of a food and catering company today designing and building it’s own computer is unthinkable! I remember in the late 1960′s, businesses such as Massachusetts General Hospital were creating their own programming languages, data base software and teleprocessing monitors – activities that would be considered wholly irresponsible today. I wonder if 15 years from now we will look back at the turn of this century and be bemused by the fact that typical companies of any size at all maintained IT organizations – in some cases, thousands of IT professionals – writing programs, tending help desks, and so forth.
So, What’s Happening to the IT Organization?
For many years the annual surveys of top CIO issues list business-IT alignment. It’s a noble and challenging goal – and it’s no longer the right goal! A combination of technology advances, advances in standards and architectures (mostly prompted by the Internet revolution) and the increasing IT literacy across the business means that the challenge has moved beyond Business-IT Alignment to Business-IT Convergence.
From Business-IT Alignment to Convergence
Let’s drill further into this convergence phenomenon. Today, many IT activities, including project management, information analysis, application configuration are devolving into Business Units while others are consolidating with support functions such as HR, Finance, etc. Helping to drive this is the rapid consumerization of IT devices and services, with iPhone’s, iPads, Android devices and the like becoming an important window into business systems and information. Further driving this is the increasing ‘IT Savvy’ and confidence with IT that business executives, line managers and workers (especially, knowledge workers) increasingly feel. This is in part generational – people entering the workforce with high IT literacy, and in part a byproduct of people’s engagement through social media, e-commerce and so on.
From Owning to Sourcing IT Capabilities
The last decade or so has seen a shift from owning all needed IT capabilities (data centers, server farms, software teams, application development groups, desktop support, etc.) to sourcing these capabilities externally. Today, traditional functional outsourcing is being continuously expanded, and now often includes Business Process outsourcing as well as the outsourcing of compute power, data storage, IT infrastructure, applications and platforms through the rapid rise of Cloud Computing.
Information is Becoming both Strategic and Implicit
Information is becoming an increasingly strategic asset. There is compelling research data showing how companies are successfully embracing and competing on business analytics. At the same time, data is also becoming implicit to business management and operations – increasingly representing what the business manages and how it manages. In many respects, the context for IT today is becoming less about IT and more about information – the ability to capture, integrate, interpret, predict, and act is increasingly the holy grail of competitive advantage – and that belongs in the business – not in a separate specialist group.
So, Where Do IT Capabilities Belong?
Now, I’m on dangerous ground, because the answer depends – on the nature of the business, IT savvyness of business managers and knowledge workers, and their vision for how they want to deploy and manage information and IT. But, I’d argue that many IT capabilities belong in business operations. For example:
- Business Process Management
- Business Analytics
- Project Management
- Satisfying Business Unit application needs
Other IT capabilities belong in the governance of the business. This might include, for example:
- Enterprise Architecture
- IT Strategy
- Portfolio and Program Management
And finally, some IT capabilities should be centrally coordinated and shared. Examples here include:
- Common and shared IT Infrastructure
- Enterprise Applications
So, What Are the Implications for IT Leadership and the IT Professional?
I will save that for a follow-up post, but suffice it to say that most companies and their IT organizations are not quite ready for the shift I’m espousing (and, indeed, predicting). And, I think it is the clear responsibility of IT leadership to help lead this revolution – ensuring that it is orderly and safe – ensuring that the business and IT professionals are fully prepared and able to take advantage of business-IT convergence.
Please join me in the next post on this topic – and in the meantime, please weigh in with your perspectives and observations.
Painting by Joseph-Noël Sylvestre: The Sack of Rome by the Barbarians in 410

Pingback: Tweets that mention The Decline and Fall of the IT Organization? « IT Organization Circa 2017 -- Topsy.com
Hi Vaughan.
Thanks for this post today. I was in bad need of some brain food.
Your comment about “convergence” of Business and IT, as opposed to “alignment” struck a chord with me.
I’m wondering if, rather than convergence, it might be something more like assimilation or assumption. In so many cases, there are more and more IT Services that are self-service in nature,… or have self-service options available that facilitate DIY by the Business. That, I think, is a contemporary development, and can be credited to the product and service vendor community.
Many IT Services that were once very complicated to configure and apply, now have wrappers around them that are manipulated largely in business terms.
Another reason I offer this viewpoint is that in experience with my own Clients, I haven’t really seen many instances of the “IT-Business Alignment” issue being any better today than it was five years ago. It’s been a difficult interface to resolve. Possibly, this phenomenon of easy-access and self-service is facilitating more ways for the Business to take matters into their own hands.
We certainly have a stream of “take things into your own hands’ consciousness in the world today, don’t we?
Bob
Bob, I like your use of the terms “assimilation” and “assumption”. I’ve also used “confluence” elsewhere, but for whatever reason, I’ve latched onto the term “convergence.” I guess, “a rose by any other name…”!
One of my favorite books (and authors) was The Third Wave, by Alvin Toffler. He awakened me to the notion that the separate of production from consumption was an unnatural act – that the inherent forces would lead to “prosumption.” That is, I believe, what we are coming to with IT.
Vaughan,
Wonderful post. I agree with prediction as the trends and discontinuities all point in this direction. I believe most companies are trending this way now and will increasingly move this way. More and more of the technology budget is already being transferred to the business units and the decisions related to IT spend with it. Timeline of this transition is a topic worthy of discussion. At some tipping point there will be corporate competitve advantage to consider and the we will have passed the inflection point.
As always, I’m looking forward to your next post.
Russ
Thanks Russ! It’s interesting – I’m getting 2 types of response to this post. One is, “Duhhhh!” Like this is really old news. The other is, “You’re crazy if you think this will ever happen!”
That’s the reaction I got to my articles about email being a dead technology (or at least that we’re still using in zombie form).
I don’t think this is overly controversial at all. Cloud has been in play for a few years now.
My theory is that, like many things, the adoption of cloud and SaaS will at first be slow, and then it will be ubiquitous. Seemingly overnight. Think of email, or the cell phone. Where was the cell phone in 1995? Where was it by 2000? Where was email in 1992? Where was it by 1998? Or even the laptop. How widespread was the laptop in 1999 versus 2004? Or the smartphone? And each of these actually pushes “technology” more and more to everyday use and consumption.
When there is large “Credit Card IT” (that is, when the Business decides it no longer wants to hear that to build a X app/service (say…CRM app) it will take 2 years and 2 million plus then ongoing support and quite possible there will be delays and overruns on the budget and quite probable that the final delivery will not meet all requirements and to keep it “current” it will take more money/resources…when there is SalesForce waiting to embrace you for just 99.99 a month (or whatever their rate is)! All you need is your credit card and boom! You have an instant IT service being provided to you that you can access anywhere at anytime! No need to worry about DC space and power. No need to worry about IT training budgets. No need to worry about “updating servers” or needing a whole other DC for DR plans.
Anyway, I did have some questions for you.
Who (or maybe ‘where’) do you imagine will manage the Cloud and/or SaaS contracts? Will that fall to some Business person and we will all hope they understand the technology well enough to know what is a ‘valid’ reason for maintenance and what is just nonsense – or that they will have enough savvy to understand if they need to pay for additional ‘add-on’ fees (there will always be ‘add-on’ fees!) or not?
Who/how will we manage BPM through several vendors? If my marketing app is here, my sales app there, and my AR system at another spot – how do I manage to pull in all the disparate data perform Business Analytics?
And overall, where would you put IS Change Management (esp with vendors introducing changes that could impact your ‘business’ process – much less any IS processes) and IS Security? Do they both fall under the ‘Governance’ umbrella?
Thanks for the comment, Stephen, and for the questions. I’ll try to provide answers:
I do see a central organization – some form of Shared Services (or possible a staff function) with responsibility for sourcing strategy and sourcing management. This has to go way beyond the typical procurement office. From my experience, they do not work at the speed of business, and can’t deal with the subtleties of different arrangement needs. They are often good at paper clips and massive deals – nothing in between or that does not fall into a traditional service classification. The Strategic Sourcing Office, or whatever it’s called, will require multiple competencies – IT, legal, accounting, governance, etc. It will also have to have strong relationships with its business customers.
To your second question, a critical piece of enterprise (and entire ecosystem) “glue” is Enterprise Architecture. That provides the frameworks to manage multiple sources and data (internal and external). So, the Strategic Sourcing Office in collaboration with Enterprise Architecture (and others) is key to this.
As for IS Change Management, this must be thought of and approached from a pretty rigorous process and services perspective. This is where frameworks such as ITIL can be of help. But many of the basic IT infrastructure services must be managed by end-to-end processes – and yes, you are correct – there are enterprise-wide governance implications for IT infrastructure.
Great questions, thanks Stephen!
Pingback: Does your IT Value Proposition Resonate? « simple processes